翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Hoffman Marsh ・ Hoffman Memorial State Wayside ・ Hoffman modulation contrast microscopy ・ Hoffman Notch Wilderness Area ・ Hoffman nucleation theory ・ Hoffman Park ・ Hoffman Peak ・ Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB ・ Hoffman Point (Antarctica) ・ Hoffman Point, California ・ Hoffman Round Barn ・ Hoffman tank gunfire simulator ・ Hoffman Television ・ Hoffman Township, McPherson County, South Dakota ・ Hoffman tunnel ・ Hoffman v. Jones ・ Hoffman X-1 ・ Hoffman's Chocolate ・ Hoffman's Course of Legal Study ・ Hoffman, Illinois ・ Hoffman, Minnesota ・ Hoffman, New Jersey ・ Hoffman, New York ・ Hoffman, North Carolina ・ Hoffman, Oklahoma ・ Hoffman, U.S. Virgin Islands ・ Hoffman-Bowers-Josey-Riddick House ・ Hoffman-Henon ・ Hoffman-Kensington High School ・ Hoffmaniada Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Hoffman v. Jones ： ウィキペディア英語版 Hoffman v. Jones ''Hoffman v. Jones'', (Fla. 1973), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Florida that was the first adoption of the comparative negligence rule in negligence law through judicial decision as opposed to adoption through statute.〔''Hoffman v. Jones'', 280 So.2d 431 (Fla. 1973)〕 In the wrongful death case of Hoffman v. Jones, attorney (Sammy Cacciatore Jr. ) was instrumental in causing the Florida Supreme Court to adopt for the first time the comparative negligence rule in negligence law.William Harrison Jones Jr. was killed by a Pav-A-Way Corporation truck driven by Philip Francis Hoffman Jr. It was the first case in the nation in which a state supreme court abandoned the almost-150-year-old doctrine of contributory negligence, which precluded an injured victim from recovery if the victim had contributed to the incident to any degree. The Florida Supreme Court adopted the concept of “pure” comparative negligence, which allows a victim to be compensated for the percentage of harm caused by the at-fault person. The decision of the court in Hoffman v. Jones has been cited in law school textbooks, and now the concept of comparative negligence is the prevailing doctrine. ==Impact== ''Hoffman'' was cited by the California Supreme Court as precedent for their decision to adopt a comparative negligence scheme in California.〔''Li v. Yellow Cab Company of California'' 13 Cal. 3d 804, 812 (1975)〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Hoffman v. Jones」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.